Collectivism and Individualism in The Fountainhead free essay sample

Ayn Rand’s questionable novel The Fountainhead specifically addresses the ideas of cooperation and independence. The characters in the novel are sensational portrayals of Rand’s theory identified with these two convictions; in any case, except if the peruser completely fathoms the contrasts between these two philosophical ideas, the activities of the characters lose their importance. While the two ideas are philosophical conviction frameworks for controlling conduct, the peruser will characterize the terms by looking at their disparities. The peruser may comprehend the terms at first by looking at the distinctions in the exacting and interpretive meanings of each term. The strict definitions uncover huge contrasts in significance. Merriam Websters word reference expresses that independence is, â€Å"a hypothesis keeping up the political and financial autonomy of the individual and focusing on singular activity, activity, and interests.†(Merriam Webster). As indicated by this equivalent word reference, community is characterized as being â€Å"a political or monetary hypothesis supporting aggregate control particularly over creation and dissemination. We will compose a custom paper test on Community and Individualism in The Fountainhead or on the other hand any comparable point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page †(Merriam Webster). These definitions just show the political part of the book, anyway the novel is additionally founded on one’s psyche and soul. The interpretive definitions feature convincing contrasts between these two convictions. All through the novel the nonconformist is one who saw nothing amiss with his convictions and didn't feel that anybody was second rate compared to him. Regardless of the response of others in the start of this novel reasoning that he thought about nobody however himself, by the end individuals had the option to see that he was â€Å"[. . .] a man absolutely guiltless of fear† (678). Then again community is characterized as individuals being impacted by the entire to turn into a â€Å"socially accepted† individual. Just changing and adjusting to fit in and feel as though they fit in. The peruser may harden his comprehension of the two conviction frameworks by inspecting the contrasting impacts each produces. The impacts of community on the individual and society obviously characterize the way of thinking. Cooperation delineated in the novel is appeared by expressing that the mass cooperates for a more noteworthy reason and to get equivalent. This community causes â€Å" A reality where no man [. . . ] hold[s] a craving for himself, yet [. . .] satisf[ies] the longing of his neighbor†(639). The impacts of independence clarify the significance of this conviction framework. Ayn Rand represents independence similar to an individual who accomplishes their objectives, regardless of the downsides that are constrained upon them and â€Å"[. . .] its wonder started with one [person] and that one paid for his courage†(679). The Foutainhead presents the idea that the independent consistently needed to battle from the beginning of time and albeit some paid with their life,†[. . .] they won†(679). Also, in spite of the fact that crafted by these incredible individuals are extraordinary, collectivist accept that nobody ought to be made capable and nobody individual ought to be compensated for these fulfillments. What they derive is that each thought is the generation of somebody elses reasoning that nobody thought is one of enormity. The distinctions in the importance of these two terms are obvious all through the novel, both make an equivalent parity to illuminate the peruser regarding what the basic issues are. Before I read this book I accepted that independence was the demonstration of self-centeredness and that cooperation was the specialty of individuals combining to turn out to be better. Anyway through cautious perusing and in class conversations I feel that independence is close to an individual following what they think to be correct and help make a final result for the individuals, which is unselfish. What's more, I additionally accept that cooperation is a kind of indoctrinate arrangement that gives no credit to the individuals who genuinely merit it. Both cooperation and independence have there destructions. Today as I would like to think nobody is a genuine independent, yet in addition I see no collectivist to degree that is delineated in the novel. My feelings on these two speculations have changed completely all through the novel and my last view is that, not every person is great and not every person can be the individual who they genuinely need to be.